Skip to content
Sunday, October 11, 2026
Explore expert UK business insights, market trends, and str…

Will Additional States Pursue Australia's Example in Banning Social Media for Under-16s?

The nation's controversial move to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a increasing number of countries are exploring comparable measures.

  • Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". A law may be passed next year.
  • Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the AI".
  • The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options under consideration".
  • In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on the legislature to approve a proposal lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
  • In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
  • The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic motion supporting a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is provided. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," stated the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in strong data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material contends that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are secure and fit for young users," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the local level amid national gridlock.

  • Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
  • The state of Florida has passed a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
  • The state of Virginia has passed a regulation limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further use needing a guardian's okay.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain individuals to mimic the Australian path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from these regions, additional states are also considering moves.

  • Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
  • Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation continues, the actions of the Australian government and others indicate that governments globally are increasingly prepared to delay for the industry to self-regulate.

About the author

Beverly Perez

A seasoned UK business analyst with over 15 years of experience in market research and strategic consulting, specializing in global economic trends.

Focus Global Site

Type to search articles.